If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() Journal of Small Animal PracticeVolume 49 Issue 2, Pages 74 - 79 Published Online: 7 Sep 2007 © 2010 British Small Animal Veterinary Association
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 382K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking PAPER The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of pharyngeal penetration injuries in dogs M. J. Dobromylskyj's current address is Division of Immunology, Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire RG20 7NN Copyright 2007 British Small Animal Veterinary Association ABSTRACTObjectives: To investigate the correlation between the magnetic resonance imaging findings and subsequent surgical findings for a series of dogs presenting with suspected pharyngeal stick injuries to the Animal Health Trust, Newmarket, between 1995 and 2004. Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging findings were reviewed for patients undergoing a scan of the pharyngeal or cervical area for suspected foreign bodies during the years 1995 to 2004. Results: Case signalment, history and clinical signs were similar to those reported in previous studies. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated foreign material in six of seven cases where this was present. There was good correlation between diagnosis of a foreign body at magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent surgical identification. Clinical Significance: Compared with other imaging modalities, magnetic resonance imaging is very helpful for this type of injury, especially in chronic cases where radiographic evidence of a foreign body is unlikely. It is a valuable aid in the diagnosis of pharyngeal penetration injury and in surgical planning. Received: 04 July 2007; |