ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 82K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

On the importance of the negative selection effect for the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning
Lin Jiang, Zhichao Pu and Diana R. Nemergut,
Correspondence to L. Jiang (lin.jiang@biology.gatech.edu) and Z. Pu, School of Biology, Georgia Inst. of Technology, 310 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA. – D. R. Nemergut, Environmental Studies Program and Inst. of Arctic and Alpine Research, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Copyright Journal compilation © 2008 Oikos

ABSTRACT

Much of our knowledge on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning comes from studies examining the effects of biodiversity on biomass production within a trophic group. A large number of these studies have found that increasing biodiversity tends to increase biomass production, leading many ecologists to believe that there exists a general positive relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Here we argue that such a positive relationship may not be general, particularly for ecosystem functions other than biomass. Our argument centers on the potential importance of the negative selection effect, which operates where competitively dominant species do not contribute significantly to the function of interest. We suggest that negative selection effects may be potentially common for non-biomass functions, for which species competitive ability may often be a poor indictor of its functional impact. We conclude that diverse (positive, negative, and neutral) BEF relationships are possible for non-biomass functions and that for a particular function, the exact form of the BEF relationship may depend on how species functional impacts relate to their competitive abilities in the community.


Manuscript Accepted 5 December 2007

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16401.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Latest News & Information

from the Wiley-Blackwell Life Sciences Team

Join Twitter for our News Updates
Per Brinck Oikos Award
Sign up here