|
If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
  Terra NovaVolume 20 Issue 2, Pages 169 - 172 Published Online: 18 Feb 2008 © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 195K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking  Reply Lake Cheko and the Tunguska Event: impact or non-impact? Copyright Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Terra Nova, 00, 000–000, 2008
ABSTRACTSeveral lines of evidence were presented in Gasperini et al. [Terra Nova (2007), vol. 19, pp. 245–251] suggesting that Lake Cheko, a small lake close to the alleged epicentre of the 1908 Tunguska Event, might be a secondary impact crater. Collins et al. [Terra Nova (2008), this volume] argue against this hypothesis. We reply here arguing in favour of an impact origin for Lake Cheko. Received 31 August 2007; Revised version accepted 19 December 2007 |
