If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 89K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Research Article
The Value of Believing in Free Will: Encouraging a Belief in Determinism Increases Cheating
Kathleen D. Vohs 1 and Jonathan W. Schooler 2
  1 Department of Marketing, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, and   2 Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia
 Address correspondence to Kathleen Vohs, Department of Marketing, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, 3-150, 321 19th Ave. South, Minneapolis, MN 55455, e-mail: vohsx005@umn.edu.
Copyright Copyright © 2008 Association for Psychological Science

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT—Does moral behavior draw on a belief in free will? Two experiments examined whether inducing participants to believe that human behavior is predetermined would encourage cheating. In Experiment 1, participants read either text that encouraged a belief in determinism (i.e., that portrayed behavior as the consequence of environmental and genetic factors) or neutral text. Exposure to the deterministic message increased cheating on a task in which participants could passively allow a flawed computer program to reveal answers to mathematical problems that they had been instructed to solve themselves. Moreover, increased cheating behavior was mediated by decreased belief in free will. In Experiment 2, participants who read deterministic statements cheated by overpaying themselves for performance on a cognitive task; participants who read statements endorsing free will did not. These findings suggest that the debate over free will has societal, as well as scientific and theoretical, implications.


(Received 4/10/07; Revision accepted 6/10/07)

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02045.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Introducing

Cognitive Science Journals

In 2009, Wiley-Blackwell is proud to publish Cognitive Science and the new journal Topics in Cognitive Science on behalf of the Cognitive Science Society.

Visit the Society site

Member Benefit


ATTENTION APS MEMBERS:
You have access to all issues of Psychological Science online from Volume 1, Issue 1 to today’s.