If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 98K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Research Article
Personality Dominance and Preferential Use of the Vertical Dimension of Space: Evidence From Spatial Attention Paradigms
Sara K. Moeller 1 , Michael D. Robinson 1 , and Darya L. Zabelina 1
  1 North Dakota State University
 Address correspondence to Sara Moeller, Psychology Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, e-mail: sara.moeller@ndsu.edu.
Copyright Copyright © 2008 Association for Psychological Science

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT—Previous research has shown that dominant individuals frequently think in terms of dominance hierarchies, which typically invoke vertical metaphor (e.g., "upper" vs. "lower" class). Accordingly, we predicted that in spatial attention paradigms, such individuals would systematically favor the vertical dimension of space more than individuals low in dominance. This prediction was supported by two studies (total N= 96), which provided three tests involving two different spatial attention paradigms. In all cases, analyses controlling for speed of response to horizontal spatial probes revealed that more dominant individuals were faster than less dominant individuals to respond to probes along the vertical dimension of space. Such data support the metaphor-representation perspective, according to which people think in metaphoric terms, even in on-line processing tasks. These results have implications for understanding dominance and also indicate that conceptual metaphor is relevant to understanding the cognitive-processing basis of personality.


(Received 7/3/07; Revision accepted 9/19/07)

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02093.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Introducing

Cognitive Science Journals

In 2009, Wiley-Blackwell is proud to publish Cognitive Science and the new journal Topics in Cognitive Science on behalf of the Cognitive Science Society.

Visit the Society site

Member Benefit


ATTENTION APS MEMBERS:
You have access to all issues of Psychological Science online from Volume 1, Issue 1 to today’s.