If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||
![]() Journal of Sleep ResearchVolume 17 Issue 2, Pages 230 - 238 Published Online: 15 Apr 2008 © 2009 European Sleep Research Society Official Journal of the European Sleep Research Society
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 268K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Obstructive sleep apnoea Evaluation of pharyngeal shape and size using anatomical optical coherence tomography in individuals with and without obstructive sleep apnoea Copyright © 2008 European Sleep Research Society KEYWORDS imaging • obstructive sleep apnoea • optical coherence tomography • pharyngeal • pharynx ABSTRACT
This study compared shape, size and length of the pharyngeal airway in individuals with and without obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) using a novel endoscopic imaging technique, anatomical optical coherence tomography (aOCT). The study population comprised a preliminary study group of 20 OSA patients and a subsequent controlled study group of 10 OSA patients and 10 body mass index (BMI)-, gender- and age-matched control subjects without OSA. All subjects were scanned using aOCT while awake, supine and breathing quietly. Measurements of airway cross-sectional area (CSA) and anteroposterior (A-P) and lateral diameters were obtained from the hypo-, oro- and velopharyngeal regions. A-P : lateral diameter ratios were calculated to provide an index of regional airway shape. In all subjects, pharyngeal CSA was lowest in the velopharynx. Patients with OSA had a smaller velopharyngeal CSA than controls (maximum CSA 91 ± 40 versus 153 ± 84 mm Accepted in revised form 21 January 2008; received 29 August 2007 |