If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||||||||||||||
![]() Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society)Volume 171 Issue 2, Pages 375 - 394 Published Online: 19 Nov 2007 © 2010 The Royal Statistical Society and Blackwell Publishing Ltd Published on behalf of the Royal Statistical Society
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 602K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Applying discrete choice models to predict Academy Award winners Copyright © 2008 The Royal Statistical Society and Blackwell Publishing Ltd KEYWORDS Bayesian • Conditional logit • Films • Forecasting • Mixed logit • Motion pictures • Movies • Multinomial logit ABSTRACTSummary. Every year since 1928, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has recognized outstanding achievement in film with their prestigious Academy Award, or Oscar. Before the winners in various categories are announced, there is intense media and public interest in predicting who will come away from the awards ceremony with an Oscar statuette. There are no end of theories about which nominees are most likely to win, yet despite this there continue to be major surprises when the winners are announced. The paper frames the question of predicting the four major awards—picture, director, actor in a leading role and actress in a leading role—as a discrete choice problem. It is then possible to predict the winners in these four categories with a reasonable degree of success. The analysis also reveals which past results might be considered truly surprising—nominees with low estimated probability of winning who have overcome nominees who were strongly favoured to win. [Received September 2005. Revised June 2007] |
|
| ||||||||||||
![]() | Significance |
Try to forecast the results of 10 different events, some sporting, some cultural, some just odd, that will take place between May and July 2010. Have Fun! | |