If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() Journal of Evolutionary BiologyVolume 21 Issue 2, Pages 435 - 448 Published Online: 18 Jan 2008 Journal compilation © 2010 European Society for Evolutionary Biology Published on behalf of the European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB)
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 416K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Call divergence is correlated with geographic and genetic distance in greenish warblers (Phylloscopus trochiloides): a strong role for stochasticity in signal evolution? Copyright Journal compilation © 2008 European Society for Evolutionary Biology KEYWORDS Aves • call • geographic variation •
Phylloscopus trochiloides
• sexual selection • signal evolution • song • speciation • Sylviidae • vocalization ABSTRACTDivergence in signalling systems might play a central role in speciation. To assess the importance of possible causes of signal divergence, we examine two types of vocalizations within a geographically variable species complex, the greenish warblers (Phylloscopus trochiloides Sundevall). Calls, which are used by both sexes throughout the year, and songs, which are sung primarily by breeding males, differ distinctly between two distinct Siberian forms. Through a ring of southern populations that connect the northern forms, signal divergence is correlated with both geographic distance and genetic divergence. Calls and songs differ in their particular patterns of geographic variation, probably because of the larger influence of sexual selection on songs than on calls. These patterns are supportive of neither acoustic adaptation nor morphology being major drivers of divergence in vocalizations. Rather, these results support the importance of stochastic evolution of communication systems in the evolution of new species. Received 13 September 2007; revised 16 December 2007; accepted 17 December 2007 |