If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||||
![]() Ecology LettersVolume 11 Issue 3, Pages 199 - 207 Published Online: 21 Nov 2007 Journal compilation © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS Published on behalf of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 135K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking IDEA AND PERSPECTIVE Evolution in ecological field experiments: implications for effect size Copyright © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS KEYWORDS Contemporary evolution • ecological-evolutionary feedbacks • population dynamics • rapid evolution ABSTRACTRapid evolution in response to strong selection, much of which is human-induced, has been indisputably documented. In this perspective, we suggest that adaptation may influence the effect size of treatments in ecological field experiments and alter our predictions of future dynamics in ecological systems. Field experiments often impose very strong and consistent selection over multiple generations. Focal populations may adapt to these treatments and, in the process, increase or decrease the magnitude of the treatment effect through time. We argue that how effect size changes through time will depend on the evolutionary history of the experimental population, the type of experimental manipulation, and the traits involved in adaptive responses. While no field study has conclusively demonstrated evolution in response to treatments with concomitant changes in ecological effect size, we present several examples that provide strong circumstantial evidence that such effects occur. We conclude with a consideration of the differences between plastic and genetic responses to treatments and discuss future research directions linking adaptation to ecological effect size. Editor, Oswald Schmitz Manuscript received 29 June 2007 First decision made 27 July 2007 Second decision made 26 September 2007 Manuscript accepted 10 October 2007 |
|
|
Click here to ‘Become a Fan’ of Ecology Letters on FaceBook.
![]() |