If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Family Court ReviewVolume 46 Issue 1, Pages 198 - 215 Published Online: 19 Dec 2007 Copyright 2010 by the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts The Journal of the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts
Abstract | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 165K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY PINK OR BLUE: HOW SEX SELECTION TECHNOLOGY FACILITATES GENDERCIDE AND WHAT WE CAN DO ABOUT IT Monica Sharma received her Juris Doctorate from Hofstra University in 2001. She went on to work for the City of New York at the Administration for Children's Services in the abuse and neglect division. Monica returned to Hofstra and joined the premiering Family Law LLM program and graduated with honors in 2007. Monica lives in New York with her husband and two sons. Her interest in Sex Selection was fueled by her own personal desire to have a daughter while researching the available reproductive advancements allowing couples to determine the sex of their unborn child she learned of the global gender imbalance prompting her to write this article. She is a member of the New York and New Jersey Bar. Copyright © 2008 Association of Family and Conciliation Courts KEYWORDS
sex selection
•
gendercide
•
sex selection regulation
•
gender imbalance
•
son preference
•
family balancing
•
microsort
•
nation of bachelors
•
bare branches
•
missing girls
ABSTRACTIn the midst of a genetic revolution in medicine, Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) has become a well-established technique to help infertile women achieve pregnancy. But many women are now turning to ART not just to circumvent infertility, but consciously to shape their families by determining the sex of their children. Many patriarchal cultures have a gender preference for males and to date have used technological advances in reproductive medicine to predetermine the sex of the child being born. Women have sought sex-selective abortions, where the pregnancy was being terminated solely on the basis of the sex of the unborn fetus. The combination of ART advances and gender preference has led to the disappearance of at least 100 million girls from the world's population leading to a mass gendercide. This article examines the societal impact of unbalanced gender ratios and the need to regulate sex selection to avoid nations of bachelors. |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | CALL FOR PAPERS! |
Submit your paper to Family Court Review! The journal currently seeks manuscripts covering:
Click HERE for submission details. | |
![]() | Family Court Review |
“Effects of Father and Mother Parenting on Children’s Mental Health in High- and Low-Conflict Divorces” Click here for FREE article access. | |
![]() | It’s time to renew your subscription to Family Court Review. |
Click here for 2010 subscription rates and to renew securely online. | |

