ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Volume 6 Issue 3, Pages 464 - 469

Published Online: 18 Dec 2007

© 2010 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 135K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Quality assurance for oral anticoagulation self management: a cluster randomized trial
E. T. MURRAY*, I. JENNINGS*, D. KITCHEN*, S. KITCHEN and D. A. FITZMAURICE
  *UK NEQAS for Blood Coagulation, Sheffield ; and   Department of Primary Care and General Practice, Clinical Sciences Building, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Correspondence to E. T. Murray, Department of Primary Care and General Practice, Clinical Sciences Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Tel.: +44 121 414 3761; fax: +44 121 414 3759; e-mail: e.t.murray@bham.ac.uk
Copyright © 2008 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis
KEYWORDS
external quality assurance • patient self management

ABSTRACT

Summary.  Background and aims: External quality assessment (EQA) should be an inherent component of patient self management (PSM) of oral anticoagulation. The aim of this study was to evaluate methods of EQA for patients within a cluster randomized trial. Method: After development of methods, general practises were randomly allocated to a formal EQA scheme of patients performing the test independently at home or at their practise with supervision. The supervised group of practises was further sub divided to test two other EQA methods: (i) venous sample compared with patients' point of care (POC) device; and (ii) patients POC compared with reference POC. Primary trial outcome measure was reliability of results from the formal scheme taking into account adherence and test errors. Results: Proportion of EQA scheme tests in range was 633/836 (75.7%). Proportion in range was significantly higher in group performing independently compared with supervised group, 80.1% vs. 71.5% respectively, P = 0.02. Sixty-six percent of tests were in range with venous compared with patients POC, and 88% in patients POC compared with reference POC. Conclusion: Patients are able to undertake a formal EQA scheme and perform more reliably at home independently. There are satisfactory alternatives if a formal scheme is not acceptable.


Received 5 October 2007, accepted 11 December 2007

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02875.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member

Latest News & Information
JTH SoA Feature

Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Latest News & Information
JTH Impact Factor

Sign Up Now

Sign Up Now

Be the first to know about new research in your field

Sign up for FREE e-alerts from Wiley-Blackwell journals!

Sign Up Now