If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() Journal of Thrombosis and HaemostasisVolume 6 Issue 3, Pages 464 - 469 Published Online: 18 Dec 2007 © 2010 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis The official journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 135K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking ORIGINAL ARTICLE Quality assurance for oral anticoagulation self management: a cluster randomized trial Copyright © 2008 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis KEYWORDS external quality assurance • patient self management ABSTRACTSummary. Background and aims: External quality assessment (EQA) should be an inherent component of patient self management (PSM) of oral anticoagulation. The aim of this study was to evaluate methods of EQA for patients within a cluster randomized trial. Method: After development of methods, general practises were randomly allocated to a formal EQA scheme of patients performing the test independently at home or at their practise with supervision. The supervised group of practises was further sub divided to test two other EQA methods: (i) venous sample compared with patients' point of care (POC) device; and (ii) patients POC compared with reference POC. Primary trial outcome measure was reliability of results from the formal scheme taking into account adherence and test errors. Results: Proportion of EQA scheme tests in range was 633/836 (75.7%). Proportion in range was significantly higher in group performing independently compared with supervised group, 80.1% vs. 71.5% respectively, P = 0.02. Sixty-six percent of tests were in range with venous compared with patients POC, and 88% in patients POC compared with reference POC. Conclusion: Patients are able to undertake a formal EQA scheme and perform more reliably at home independently. There are satisfactory alternatives if a formal scheme is not acceptable. Received 5 October 2007, accepted 11 December 2007 |