ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Genes, Brain and Behavior

Genes, Brain and Behavior

Volume 7 Issue 4, Pages 393 - 402

Published Online: 17 Oct 2007

Journal compilation © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/International Behavioural and Neural Genetics Society



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 202K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Genetic and phenotypic effects of phonological short-term memory and grammatical morphology in specific language impairment
M. Falcaro , A. Pickles*,†, D. F. Newbury , L. Addis , E. Banfield , S. E. Fisher , A. P. Monaco , Z. Simkin , G. Conti-Ramsden The SLI Consortium
  Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, and  The Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Oxford, United Kingdom
Correspondence to   *A. Pickles, Biostatistics Group, The University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK. E-mail: andrew.pickles@manchester.ac.uk

  1 Members of the SLI Consortium: The Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford: D. F. Newbury, E. Banfield, L. Addis, J. D. Cleak, S. E. Fisher, L. R. Cardon and A. P. Monaco. Cambridge Language and Speech Project (CLASP): M. J. Merricks and I. M. Goodyer. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Department and Medical Research Council Centre for Social, Developmental, and Genetic Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry: E. Simonoff and P. F. Bolton. Newcomen Centre, Guy's Hospital: V. Slonims and G. Baird. Department of Child Health, University of Aberdeen: A. Everitt, E. Hennessy, D. Shaw and P. J. Helms. The Raeden Centre and Grampian University Hospitals Trust: A. D. Kindley. Speech and Hearing Sciences, Queen Margaret University College: A. Clark and J. Watson. Department of Reproductive and Developmental Sciences, University of Edinburgh: A. O'Hare. Molecular Medicine Centre, University of Edinburgh: J. Seckl. Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh: H. Cowie. Department of Educational and Professional Studies, University of Strathclyde: W. Cohen. Academic Unit of Neurology, University of Sheffield Medical School: J. Nasir. Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford: D. V. M. Bishop. Human Communication and Deafness, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester: Z. Simkin and G. Conti-Ramsden. Biostatistics Group, University of Manchester: M. Falcaro and A. Pickles.

Copyright Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
KEYWORDS
Familial aggregation • grammatical morphology • linkage analysis • phonological short-term memory • selected sample • specific language impairment

ABSTRACT

Deficits in phonological short-term memory and aspects of verb grammar morphology have been proposed as phenotypic markers of specific language impairment (SLI) with the suggestion that these traits are likely to be under different genetic influences. This investigation in 300 first-degree relatives of 93 probands with SLI examined familial aggregation and genetic linkage of two measures thought to index these two traits, non-word repetition and tense marking. In particular, the involvement of chromosomes 16q and 19q was examined as previous studies found these two regions to be related to SLI. Results showed a strong association between relatives' and probands' scores on non-word repetition. In contrast, no association was found for tense marking when examined as a continuous measure. However, significant familial aggregation was found when tense marking was treated as a binary measure with a cut-off point of −1.5 SD, suggestive of the possibility that qualitative distinctions in the trait may be familial while quantitative variability may be more a consequence of non-familial factors. Linkage analyses supported previous findings of the SLI Consortium of linkage to chromosome 16q for phonological short-term memory and to chromosome 19q for expressive language. In addition, we report new findings that relate to the past tense phenotype. For the continuous measure, linkage was found on both chromosomes, but evidence was stronger on chromosome 19. For the binary measure, linkage was observed on chromosome 19 but not on chromosome 16.


Received 19 June 2007, revised 6 September 2007, accepted for publication 25 September 2007

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1601-183X.2007.00364.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Virtual Issue Now Online
Sign up here
Sign-up for Content Alerts
Sign up for Content Alerts
Latest News & Information

Sign up for the Neurology NewsWire.

Neuro Newsletter

Get 6 free issues of breaking news and research delivered to your inbox each year!