ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

Volume 5 Issue 1, Pages 77 - 107

Published Online: 4 Feb 2008

© 2009 Cornell Law School and Wiley Subscription Services, Inc



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 501K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Cultures of Claiming: Local Variation in Malpractice Claim Frequency
Kevin D. Hart 1 and Philip G. Peters 2*
  1 Finger Lakes Health Systems Agency, Rochester, NY and University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry
  2 University of Missouri–Columbia
Correspondence to   *Kevin D. Hart, 105 Beckwith Terrace, Rochester, NY 14610; email: kevindhart@gmail.com. Hart is currently a senior health policy analyst with the Finger Lakes Health Systems Agency, Rochester, NY. Most of his work on this article was done while he was an Assistant Professor at the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry. Peters is the Ruth L. Hulston Professor of Law, University of Missouri–Columbia.

 The authors thank Dana Mukamel, Ph.D., Bruce Jacobs, Ph.D., Susan Fisher, Ph.D., and Richard Frankel, Ph.D., all of whom commented on earlier versions of this work, and Peter Veazie, Ph.D., who gave statistical advice.

Copyright Journal compilation ©2008, Cornell Law School and Blackwell Publishing, Inc.

ABSTRACT

Several studies have examined rates of malpractice claims at state levels, but there is little systematic work looking at variations of claiming rates within a state. This study reports on small-area variations in malpractice claim rates within New York State over a 14-year period. Counties with high rates generally had high rates over the entire period, while counties with low rates maintained low rates. Rates across counties varied considerably, with an almost five-times difference between the rates for the lowest county and the highest county. In a multivariate analysis using claim data from five years, we found median family income was one of the strongest factors positively associated with the claim rate. A measure of the risk of hospital admissions for an adverse outcome also had a strong association with the county's malpractice claim rate, but the risk factor was negatively associated with high claim rates, perhaps suggesting an association with quality of care and malpractice claims.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00119.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Hot Topic
JELS

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies offers the most downloaded articles of 2008!

Click on the links below for FREE access:

IT'S TIME TO RENEW YOUR MEMBERSHIP


It’s time to renew your membership in the Society for Empirical Legal Studies.

Click here for 2010 membership rates and to renew securely online.

Law
Law