If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||||
![]() British Journal of DermatologyVolume 121 Issue 6, Pages 759 - 762 Published Online: 29 Jul 2006 Journal compilation © 2010 British Association of Dermatologists An Official Journal of the British Association of Dermatologists
Abstract | References | Full Text: PDF (Size: 229K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Sulphamethoxypyridazine for dermatitis herpetiformis, linear IgA disease and cicatricial pemphigoid Copyright 1989 British Association of Dermatologists ABSTRACT
One-hundred and sixty-eight cases of dermatitis herpetiformis were reviewed to compare the clinical response to and incidence of side-effects from dapsone and sulphamethoxypyridazine. Thirty-seven received sulphamethoxypyridazine (0·25–1·5 g/day) as a single agent therapy at some stage during their care and 161 had dapsone only (50–450 mg/day). Thirty of these patients received both drugs, but at different times. Both were highly effective in controlling the skin disease in 97% of patients on dapsone and 89% on sulphamethoxypyridazine. While 36 (22%) of dapsone-treated subjects had intolerable side effects warranting a change in therapy, this occurred in only five (13·5%) of those treated with sulphamethoxypyridazine. Sulphamethoxypyridazine was also effective as a single agent in three patients with linear IgA disease who had suffered adverse effects from dapsone, and in 10 out of 15 patients with oral and cutaneous lesions of cicatricial pemphigoid. Accepted for publication 6 June 1989 |