If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||||||||||||||||
![]() Journal of PersonalityVolume 57 Issue 2, Pages 195 - 214 Published Online: 28 Apr 2006 © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Abstract | References | Full Text: PDF (Size: 971K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Five Robust Trait Dimensions: Development, Stability, and Utility Part of this work was supported by Grant MH 22212 from the National Institute of Mental Health The author wishes to thank two anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments Copyright 1989 Duke University Press ABSTRACT
ABSTRACTInterest has grown in recent years in a five-factor model for the organization of personality characteristics A brief history of the development of this model is given It is evident that the model is very general across variations in raters and ratees and across languages There is also evidence that the structure of personality inventories reflects this model Although most of the studies that have demonstrated the model have utilized either self-report inventories or have relied on ratings, there is clear evidence that both ratings and inventories are importantly related to actual behavior A longitudinal study of children's personality traits is reported Evidence for the five-factor model is examined, including data for the stability over time of characteristics organized in terms of the model One trait of particular focus in this study has been Factor 3, often interpreted as Conscientiousness but here referred to as Will to Achieve because of its high correlations with formal measures of educational achievement Studies indicate that this dimension is responsible for much of the variance in achievement left unexplained by aptitude measures Manuscript received March 7 1988 revised September 22 1988 |
|
IT'S TIME TO RENEW
|
![]() | |||||||||||||