ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

International Journal of Dermatology

International Journal of Dermatology

Volume 26 Issue 6, Pages 389 - 393

Published Online: 31 May 2007

Journal compilation © 2010 International Society of Dermatology



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 424K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Cefuroxime Axetil in the Treatment of Cutaneous Infections
Lawrence Charles Parish, M.D. 1 , David M. Cocchetto, Ph.D. 1 , Karen Werner, M.S. 1 , Donald L. Jungkind, Ph.D. 1 , Joseph Witkowski, M.D. 1
  1 From the Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the Medical Affairs Department, Glaxo Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, and the Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
 Address for correspondence: Lawrence Charles Parish, M.D., 1819 J. F. Kennedy Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19103.
Copyright 1987 Blackwell Science Ltd

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: A multicenter clinical trial was conducted in 125 out-patients with skin and skin structure infections due to bacteria in order to compare the safety and efficacy of cefuroxime axetil and cefaclor. Patients with a median age of 32 years were randomly allocated to treatment for 10 days with one of three treatments: cefuroxime axetil 250 mg b.i.d., cefuroxime axetil 500 mg b.i.d., or cefaclor 250 mg t.i.d. Clinical evaluations of each patient were done pre-treatment, 2 to 4 days intra-treatment, and within 3 days post-treatment. One patient discontinued cefuroxime axetil due to severe urticaria and one patient discontinued cefaclor due to a persistent headache and vomiting. Cefuroxime axetil was an effective antibacterial agent for treatment of common skin infections. Clinically beneficial outcome was achieved for 92% (cefuroxime axetil 250 mg b.i.d.J, 95% (cefuroxime axetil 500 mg b.i.d.J, and 97% (cefaclor 250 mg t.i.d.J of patients. Since the study failed to demonstrate a significant advantage of higher dosage, cefuroxime axetil should be prescribed in a regimen of 250 mg twice a day for patients with skin infections.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-4362.1987.tb00571.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Wiley Medical Twitter