If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||||
![]() Clinical and Experimental DermatologyVolume 7 Issue 5, Pages 529 - 536 Published Online: 27 Apr 2006 Journal compilation © 2010 British Association of Dermatologists An Official Journal of the British Association of Dermatologists
Abstract | References | Full Text: PDF (Size: 402K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Evaluation of six antihistamines in vitro and in patients with urticaria Copyright 1982 Blackwell Science Ltd ABSTRACT
Six commonly prescribed antihistamines have been ranked according to their relative potencies in blocking H In contrast, using a self-assessment method in patients with chronic urticaria, cyproheptadine was the highest ranked antihistamine in terms of both effectiveness and relative freedom from side-effects. It is concluded that in vitro evaluation of antihistaminic and antimuscarinic potencies may produce misleading results in terms of clinical usefulness of a given antihistamine. Accepted for publication 23 July 1981 |