ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Clinical & Experimental Allergy

Clinical & Experimental Allergy

Volume 12 Issue 4, Pages 355 - 361

Published Online: 27 Apr 2006

© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 1622K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

A comparison of ketotifen with clemastine, ipratropium bromide and sodium cromoglycate in exercise-induced asthma
A. J. DORWARD 1 K. R. PATEL 1
  1 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Western Infirmary and Knightswood Hospital, Glasgow
Correspondence to  Dr. A. J. Dorward, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Level 8, Western Infirmary, Glasgow G11 6NT
Copyright 1982 Blackwell Science Ltd

ABSTRACT

AbstractReferences

Exercise-induced asthma (EIA) was provoked by a standardized treadmill running for 8 min in seven atopic adult asthmatics. The tests were performed using a double-dummy technique after placebo, oral ketotifen, inhaled clemastine. ipratropium bromide and sodium cromoglycate (SCG), in a random single blind-fashion on different days. The mean post-exercise percentage fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) was 47 (s.e. 6.95), 39 (s.e. 8.35), 27 (s.e. 7.17), 23 (s.e. 7.69) and 7.0 (s.e. 4.62)% respectively. There was significantly less mean bronchoconstriction with SCG (P < 0.01), ipratropium bromide and clemastine (P < 0.05) but not with ketotifen. Six out of seven individual patients had significant protection of EIA with sodium cromoglycate, four with ipratropium bromide, three with clemastine but only one with ketotifen. Ipratropium bromide and clemastine were bronchodilators at rest, whereas SCG and ketotifen were not. Despite its claims to work as a mast cell stabilizing drug, ketotifen in a single dose does not have an effect similar to sodium cromoglycate in EIA, nor does it compare with inhaled clemastine or ipratropium bromide.


(Received 18 December 1981: accepted for publication 5 January 1982)

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-2222.1982.tb02539.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now

Sign Up Now

Be the first to know about new research in your field

Sign up for FREE e-alerts from Wiley-Blackwell journals!

Sign Up Now