If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||
![]() The International Journal of PsychoanalysisVolume 89 Issue 2, Pages 389 - 412 Published Online: 28 Jun 2008 © 2009 Institute of Psychoanalysis Published on behalf of the Institute of Psychoanalysis
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 270K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Phantastic objects and the financial market's sense of reality: A psychoanalytic contribution to the understanding of stock market instability
Copyright © 2008 Institute of Psychoanalysis KEYWORDS financial bubbles • group functioning • market instability • phantasy relationships • splitting ABSTRACTThis paper sets out to explore if standard psychoanalytic thinking based on clinical experience can illuminate instability in financial markets and its widespread human consequences. Buying, holding or selling financial assets in conditions of inherent uncertainty and ambiguity, it is argued, necessarily implies an ambivalent emotional and phantasy relationship to them. Based on the evidence of historical accounts, supplemented by some interviewing, the authors suggest a psychoanalytic approach focusing on unconscious phantasy relationships, states of mind, and unconscious group functioning can explain some outstanding questions about financial bubbles which cannot be explained with mainstream economic theories. The authors also suggest some institutional features of financial markets which may ordinarily increase or decrease the likelihood that financial decisions result from splitting off those thoughts which give rise to painful emotions. Splitting would increase the future risk of financial instability and in this respect the theory with which economic agents in such markets approach their work is important. An interdisciplinary theory recognizing and making possible the integration of emotional experience may be more useful to economic agents than the present mainstream theories which contrast rational and irrational decision-making and model them as making consistent decisions on the basis of reasoning alone. (Final version accepted 14 December 2007) |
| ||||||||