If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||||||||||||||
![]() Ethics & International AffairsVolume 18 Issue 1, Pages 41 - 46 Published Online: 30 Aug 2006 © 2009 Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs Published on behalf of the Carnegie Council
Abstract | Full Text: PDF (Size: 57K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking RESPONSE TO THE GLOBAL WARMING TRAGEDY Global Warming: More Common Than Tragic Copyright 2004 Carnegie Council on Ethics & International Affairs (CCEIA) ABSTRACTGlobal warming is indeed a difficult international environmental problem to address: it has tragedy of the commons characteristics, and problems of time horizons and uncertainty. But previous efforts at international cooperation on other environmental issues such as ozone depletion suggest that international cooperation should be possible-though difficult-on climate change. Cooperation on issues that involve long time horizons suggests that the present generation is not calculating utility quite so narrowly as game theorists posit. Experience also suggests that successful cooperation on climate change will start with measures so small as to seem inconsequential, but will set in place an institutional and scientific process that will ultimately result in much more significant cooperative efforts. Rather than representing a tragedy, the Kyoto Protocol (or something much like it) could represent the beginnings of a process in which current generations take the first steps at collective action that dramatically improve the lives of future generations. Those who are concerned about the weakness of the Kyoto Protocol should first focus on persuading the United States to join-since this is the best way to let the process work and avoid a tragedy of the commons. |
|
IT'S TIME TO RENEW
|
![]() | |||||||||||