If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||||||||||||||
![]() Psychology of Women QuarterlyVolume 23 Issue 2, Pages 221 - 244 Published Online: 28 Jul 2006 ©2009 Division 35, American Psychological Association Published on behalf of the Society for the Psychology of Women, Division 35 of the American Psychological Association
Abstract | References | Full Text: PDF (Size: 1641K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking FOCUS GROUPS A Feminist Method The author thanks Hannah Frith for the data extract quoted and for enthusiastic discussion of focus group method. Copyright 1999 Human Sciences Press ABSTRACTFocus groups are little used in feminist psychology, despite their methodological advantages. Following a brief introduction to the method, the article details three key ways in which the use of focus groups addresses the feminist critique of traditional methods in psychology. Focus groups are relatively naturalistic and so avoid the charge of artificiality; they offer social contexts for meaning-making and so avoid the charge of decontextualization; and they shift the balance of power away from the researcher toward the research participants and so avoid the charge of exploitation. The final section of the article, which evaluates the potential of focus groups for feminist research, identifies some other benefits of the method and also discusses some problems in the current use of focus groups. It concludes that the use—and development—of focus group methods offer feminist psychology an excellent opportunity for the future. Initial submission: November 17, 1996; Initial acceptance: January 22, 1997; Final acceptance: September 18, 1997 |
| |||||||||||||