ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 200K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

A randomized cross-over study of the efficacy of codeine phosphate versus Ispaghulahusk in patients with gynaecological cancer experiencing diarrhoea during pelvic radiotherapy
N. LODGE, RGN, 237, Research Charge Nurse 1 , M.L. EVANS (nee Morgan), RGN, 237, Research Sister 1*M. WILKINS, DCR (T), Research Radiographer 1 , P.R. BLAKE, MD, FRCR, Consultant Radiotherapist 1 I. FRYATT, M.Sc., Statistician 1
  1 The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK
 

*Bristol Oncology Centre, Horfield Road, Bristol BS2 8ED, UK.

Copyright 1995 Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd.
KEYWORDS
Ispaghulahusk • codeine phosphate • radiotherapy • diarrhoea • gynaecology

ABSTRACT

Diarrhoea is the commonest acute complication during radiotherapy treatment to the pelvis. Codeine phosphate and a low residue diet is the standard therapy for radiation-induced diarrhoea at The Royal Marsden NHS Trust. The hypothesis put forward was that Ispaghulahusk and codeine phosphate were equally effective in the treatment of diarrhoea during radiotherapy.

Participants in the study were female patients who had experienced change of bowel habit whilst receiving radiotherapy for their gynaecological cancer. Quantitive data was collected from patient diaries and treatment flow-sheets. Ten patients were randomized into the trial, five to codeine phosphate, and five to Ispaghulahusk. Continuing the trial was questioned after 10 patients had been treated. All five patients in the codeine phosphate arm received adequate control, while the five patients allocated to the Ispaghulahusk arm were all crossed-over to codeine phosphate with resolution of their diarrhoea.

The results show that Ispaghulahusk, whilst not totally ineffective at controlling diarrhoea, was significantly less effective than codeine phosphate. Our conclusion is that there is insufficient reason to change to a less effective and less palatable preparation for the control of radiation-induced diarrhoea.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-2354.1995.tb00046.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member