If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||
![]() MetaphilosophyVolume 39 Issue 3, Pages 402 - 421 Published Online: 6 Jun 2008 Journal compilation © 2009 Metaphilosophy LLC and Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 144K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking PRIVATE PROPERTY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS: SOME NEW DIRECTIONS Copyright Journal compilation © 2008 Metaphilosophy LLC and Blackwell Publishing Ltd KEYWORDS property • Hobbes • Locke • Coase • wise-use • occupation theory • labor theory of value • efficiency theory • environmental ethics ABSTRACTAbstract: This article argues that teachers of environmental ethics must more aggressively entertain questions of private property in their work and in their teaching. To make this case, it first introduces the three primary positions on property: occupation arguments, labor theory of value arguments, and efficiency arguments. It then contextualizes these arguments in light of the contemporary U.S. wise-use movement, in an attempt to make sense of the concerns that motivate wise-use activists, and also to demonstrate how intrinsic value arguments miss the mark. Finally, it offers some suggestions about further directions for environmental ethics, reasoning that there is a good deal of headway to be gained for environmental ethics by accepting that nature can be owned as property, but nevertheless engaging the idea of private property critically. |
| ||||||||