ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Evolution

Evolution

Volume 62 Issue 6, Pages 1528 - 1537

Published Online: 19 Mar 2008

© 2010, Society for the Study of Evolution



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 428K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

AN EVOLUTIONARY LIMIT TO MALE MATING SUCCESS
Katrina McGuigan 1,2 , Anna Van Homrigh 1 , and Mark W. Blows 1
  1 School of Integrative Biology, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia     2E-mail: k.mcguigan1@uq.edu.au
Associate Editor: K. Hughes
Copyright Journal compilation © 2008 The Society for the Study of Evolution
KEYWORDS
Artificial selection • evolutionary potential • fitness • sexual selection

ABSTRACT

The well-known phenotypic diversity of male sexual displays, and the high levels of genetic variation reported for individual display traits have generated the expectation that male display traits, and consequently male mating success, are highly evolvable. It has not been shown however that selection for male mating success, exerted by female preferences in an unmanipulated population, results in evolutionary change. Here, we tested the expectation that male mating success is highly evolvable in Drosophila bunnanda using an experimental evolution approach. Female D. bunnanda exhibit a strong, consistent preference for a specific combination of male cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs). We used female preference to select for male mating success by propagating replicate populations from either attractive or unattractive males over 10 generations. Neither the combination of CHCs under sexual selection (the sexual signal) nor male mating success itself evolved. The lack of a response to selection was consistent with previous quantitative genetic experiments in D. bunnanda that demonstrated the virtual absence of genetic variance in the combination of CHCs under sexual selection. Persistent directional selection, such as applied by female mate choice, may erode genetic variance, resulting in multitrait evolutionary limits.


Received August 22, 2007
Accepted February 28, 2008

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00379.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign up here
EVO
Special Issue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology

American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Special Issue: Race Reconciled: How Biological Anthropologists View Human Variation.

Read Now

Also of Interest
Evolution & Development

Evolution & Development

Evolution & Development serves as a voice for the rapidly growing research community at the interface of evolutionary and developmental biology.

View a Free Sample Copy

Sign up for Content Alerts