If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Psychological Science

Psychological Science

Volume 19 Issue 6, Pages 607 - 614

Published Online: 10 Jun 2008

© 2009 Association for Psychological Science


A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science (previously the American Psychological Society)
Association for Psychological Science
Go to Society Site


< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Research Article
Does Subitizing Reflect Numerical Estimation?
Susannah K. Revkin 1,2,3 , Manuela Piazza 1,2,3,4 , Véronique Izard 1,2,3,5 , Laurent Cohen 1,2,3,6,7 , and Stanislas Dehaene 1,2,3,8
  1 INSERM, U562, Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Gif/Yvette, France;   2 CEA, DSV/I2BM, NeuroSpin Center, Gif/Yvette, France;   3 Université Paris-Sud, IFR 49;   4 Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento;   5 Department of Psychology, Harvard University;   6 AP-HP, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, Department of Neurology, Paris, France;   7 Université Paris VI, IFR 70, Faculté de Médecine Pitié-Salpêtrière; and   8 Collège de France, Paris
 Address correspondence to Susannah K. Revkin, INSERM, U562, Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA/SAC/DSV/I2BM/NeuroSpin, Bât 145, Point Courrier 156, F-91191 Gif/Yvette, France, e-mail: susannahrevkin@gmail.com.
Copyright © 2008 Association for Psychological Science

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT—Subitizing is the rapid and accurate enumeration of small sets (up to 3–4 items). Although subitizing has been studied extensively since its first description about 100 years ago, its underlying mechanisms remain debated. One hypothesis proposes that subitizing results from numerical estimation mechanisms that, according to Weber's law, operate with high precision for small numbers. Alternatively, subitizing might rely on a distinct process dedicated to small numerosities. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that there is a shared estimation system for small and large quantities in human adults, using a masked forced-choice paradigm in which participants named the numerosity of displays taken from sets matched for discrimination difficulty; one set ranged from 1 through 8 items, and the other ranged from 10 through 80 items. Results showed a clear violation of Weber's law (much higher precision over numerosities 1–4 than over numerosities 10–40), thus refuting the single-estimation-system hypothesis and supporting the notion of a dedicated mechanism for apprehending small numerosities.


(Received 7/12/07; Revision accepted 11/26/07)

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02130.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Introducing

Cognitive Science Journals

In 2009, Wiley-Blackwell is proud to publish Cognitive Science and the new journal Topics in Cognitive Science on behalf of the Cognitive Science Society.

Visit the Society site

Member Benefit


ATTENTION APS MEMBERS:
You have access to all issues of Psychological Science online from Volume 1, Issue 1 to today’s.

APS