ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 106K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

The Preliminary Employment Interview as a Predictor of Assessment Center Outcomes
Kobi Dayan * , Shaul Fox ** and Ronen Kasten *
  * Department of Behavioral Science, Israeli Police, Tel-Aviv 68115, Israel
  ** Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, 52900, Israel. foxsha@mail.biu.ac.il
Copyright Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd

ABSTRACT

The current study examined the relationships between personnel employment interview scores (PEI), cognitive ability test scores (CAT) and assessment center (AC) scores, as well as the potential to circumvent the costly AC method for some of the candidates by using these less expensive selection methods. A total of 423 Israeli police force candidates participated in the study. Their PEI and CAT scores were collected in the first stage of the selection process. They subsequently participated in an AC and a final decision was made regarding their acceptance to the police force. It was found that PEI and CAT scores significantly correlated with the AC scores and the recruitment decision, although the PEI scores demonstrated stronger correlations with the criteria. An actuarial analysis demonstrated the benefit of using the AC procedure for those achieving middle range scores on the PEI and CAT, circumventing the costly ACs for those achieving high and low scores. This strategy resulted in minor costs of both α and β errors. Organizations can adopt this economical strategy when the AC costs exceed the manpower costs incurred by disposing of the AC.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00415.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member



FREE ONLINE ACCESS

Guidelines and Ethical Considerations for Assessment Center Operations
International Task Force on Assessment Center Guidelines

Assessment Center Dimensions: Individual differences correlates and meta-analytic incremental validity
Stephan Dilchert, Deniz S. Ones

Special Issue
Go to journal homepage

International Journal of Selection and Assessment
Volume 17
Issue 4

Applicant Perspectives in Selection: Going beyond Preferences in Reactions
Guest Edited Ute R. Hülsheger & Neil Anderson

Free access to Guest Editorial:
Applicant Perspectives in Selection: Going beyond preference reactions

Business & Management