ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 80K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Applicant Selection Expectations: Validating a multidimensional measure in the military
Bert Schreurs * , Eva Derous ** , Karin Proost *** , Guy Notelaers **** and Karel De Witte *****
  * Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, P.O. Box 80.140, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands. b.h.j.schreurs@uu.nl
  ** Institute of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Woudestein T13-36, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  *** Faculty of Psychology, Open Universiteit Nederland, Valkenburgerweg 177, P.O. Box 2960, 6401 DL Heerlen, The Netherlands
  **** Bergen Bullying Research Group, University of Bergen, Christiesgate 12, N-5015 Bergen, Norway
  ***** Research Group for Work, Organizational and Personnel Psychology, University of Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
Copyright Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd

ABSTRACT

Research has suggested the importance of applicants' expectations of forthcoming selection procedures in predicting how applicants react to selection procedures. Validated measures of selection expectations are still scarce, however. This study reports on the validation of the Applicant Expectation Survey (AES), intended to measure applicants' expectations of forthcoming selection procedures. The AES was validated using three military applicant samples and showed sound psychometric properties (i.e., reliability, measurement invariance, discriminant validity) for a five-factorial oblique structure consisting of 26 items. The five factors (i.e., Warmth/respect, Chance to demonstrate potential, Difficulty of faking, Unbiased assessment, Feedback) were positively related to several organizational outcome measures and to applicants' perceptions of the selection procedure, providing evidence for the predictive validity of the AES.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00421.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member



FREE ONLINE ACCESS

Guidelines and Ethical Considerations for Assessment Center Operations
International Task Force on Assessment Center Guidelines

Assessment Center Dimensions: Individual differences correlates and meta-analytic incremental validity
Stephan Dilchert, Deniz S. Ones

Special Issue
Go to journal homepage

International Journal of Selection and Assessment
Volume 17
Issue 4

Applicant Perspectives in Selection: Going beyond Preferences in Reactions
Guest Edited Ute R. Hülsheger & Neil Anderson

Free access to Guest Editorial:
Applicant Perspectives in Selection: Going beyond preference reactions

Business & Management