ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Ecology Letters

Ecology Letters

Volume 11 Issue 7, Pages 740 - 755

Published Online: 25 Apr 2008

Journal compilation © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 355K)  | Supporting Information | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

REVIEW AND SYNTHESIS
A cross-system synthesis of consumer and nutrient resource control on producer biomass
Daniel S. Gruner 1*, Jennifer E. Smith 2 , Eric W. Seabloom 3 , Stuart A. Sandin 4 , Jacqueline T. Ngai 5 , Helmut Hillebrand 6 , W. Stanley Harpole 7 , James J. Elser 8 , Elsa E. Cleland 2 , Matthew E. S. Bracken 9 , Elizabeth T. Borer 3 and Benjamin M. Bolker 10
  1 Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
  2 National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California-Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93101, USA
  3 Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
  4 Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
  5 Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
  6 Institute for Botany, University of Cologne, Koln D-50931, Germany
  7 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Irvine, CA 92697, USA
  8 School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
  9 Marine Science Center, Northeastern University, Nahant, MA 01908, USA
  10 Department of Zoology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
Correspondence to   * E-mail:dsgruner@umd.edu
Copyright © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS
KEYWORDS
Consumer–resource theory • factorial meta-analysis • fertilization • freshwater • herbivore exclusion • marine and terrestrial ecosystems • plant community • primary production • top–down and bottom–up control

ABSTRACT

Nutrient availability and herbivory control the biomass of primary producer communities to varying degrees across ecosystems. Ecological theory, individual experiments in many different systems, and system-specific quantitative reviews have suggested that (i) bottom–up control is pervasive but top–down control is more influential in aquatic habitats relative to terrestrial systems and (ii) bottom–up and top–down forces are interdependent, with statistical interactions that synergize or dampen relative influences on producer biomass. We used simple dynamic models to review ecological mechanisms that generate independent vs. interactive responses of community-level biomass. We calibrated these mechanistic predictions with the metrics of factorial meta-analysis and tested their prevalence across freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems with a comprehensive meta-analysis of 191 factorial manipulations of herbivores and nutrients. Our analysis showed that producer community biomass increased with fertilization across all systems, although increases were greatest in freshwater habitats. Herbivore removal generally increased producer biomass in both freshwater and marine systems, but effects were inconsistent on land. With the exception of marine temperate rocky reef systems that showed positive synergism of nutrient enrichment and herbivore removal, experimental studies showed limited support for statistical interactions between nutrient and herbivory treatments on producer biomass. Top–down control of herbivores, compensatory behaviour of multiple herbivore guilds, spatial and temporal heterogeneity of interactions, and herbivore-mediated nutrient recycling may lower the probability of consistent interactive effects on producer biomass. Continuing studies should expand the temporal and spatial scales of experiments, particularly in understudied terrestrial systems; broaden factorial designs to manipulate independently multiple producer resources (e.g. nitrogen, phosphorus, light), multiple herbivore taxa or guilds (e.g. vertebrates and invertebrates) and multiple trophic levels; and – in addition to measuring producer biomass – assess the responses of species diversity, community composition and nutrient status.


Editor, Jonathan Chase Manuscript received 18 January 2008 First decision made 26 February 2008 Manuscript accepted 21 March 2008

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01192.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Reduced Rate Subscriptions
Latest News & Information

from the Wiley-Blackwell Life Sciences Team

Join Twitter for our News Updates
Also of Interest
Ecology Letters now on FaceBook!

Become a Fan

Click here to ‘Become a Fan’ of Ecology Letters on FaceBook.

Sign up here