|
If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||
  Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback)Volume 105 Issue 1, Pages 25 - 53 Published Online: 8 Aug 2005 © 2009 The Aristotelian Society
Abstract | Full Text: PDF (Size: 4112K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking  II *—REALISM AND RELATIVISM IN THE THEORY OF ART Pluralism—the incommensurability and, at times, incompatibility of objective ends—is not relativism, nor, a fortiori, subjectivism, nor the allegedly unbridgeable differences of emotional attitude on which some modern positivists, emotivists, existentialists, nationalists and, indeed, relativistic sociologists and anthropologists found their accounts. Isaiah Berlin
*Meeting of the Aristotelian Society, held in Senate House, University of London, on Monday, 25 October, 2004 at 4.15 p.m. Copyright The Aristotelian Society 2005 ABSTRACTABSTRACT Some twentieth-century ideas about realism in the visual arts are criticized, a new framework for thinking about realism is proposed, and the analogy between languages and period styles in art is reassessed. | 
|
