If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
 APLAR Journal of RheumatologyVolume 8 Issue 2, Pages 114 - 118 Published Online: 8 Aug 2005 © 2007 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 96K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking  The side-effects and efficacy of leflunomide in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis Copyright © 2005 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd. KEYWORDS efficacy • leflunomide • rheumatoid arthritis • side-effects ABSTRACTAims: To investigate the efficacy and safety of leflunomide, including the side-effects, we assessed 84 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who received leflunomide treatment. Methods: We analyzed the C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), KL-6, and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ) score, American Rheumatism Association score (ACR20 and ACR50) within a time course after treatment with leflunomide. We treated 84 RA patients, 12 male and 72 female from 28 to 81-years-old, with an average age of 63.5 years. The patients were divided into three groups: a group consisting of 38 patients who received 100 mg/day of leflunomide for 3 days followed by 20 mg/day thereafter; a second group of 11 patients who received a no-loading dose of 10 mg/day; and a third group of 35 patients who received a no loading dose of 20 mg/day. Results: The 50% decrease of CRP seen in 2 weeks was 52% of the total of 84 patients. The WBC score did not change significantly after the medication was given. The KL-6 score did not change significantly, either. The VAS pain score improved 4 weeks later, and then further improved 8 weeks later. Therefore, RA patients using leflunomide obtained pain relief 4 weeks after commencing medication. The MHAQ score did not change significantly until 8 weeks after the patients started the medication. ACR20 was 62% and ACR50 was 38% at 8 weeks after treatment. The side-effects of leflunomide observed in our patients were rash, respiratory infection, diarrhea, nausea, alopecia, muscle pain, headache, dizziness and general fatigue. Twenty-three out of 84 patients experienced side-effects (27%), and 48/84 (57%) experienced withdrawal. In our hospital, there were no patients who developed severe interstitial pneumonia (IP) or who died after taking leflunomide; however, the incidence of side-effects of the 100 mg/day loading dose (42.1%) was 2.5 times higher than in the patients who received 20 mg/day (17.1%) of a no-loading dose. Conclusion: Because of this, it is possible that a 100 mg/day loading dose is a relatively high risk dose in terms of causing side-effects, especially for severely ill RA patients with a high CRP level. |  |
