If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 1159K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

The Tasman Line: where is it, what is it, and is it Australia's Rodinian breakup boundary?
N. G. DIREEN* and A. J. CRAWFORD
  Centre for Ore Deposit Research, University of Tasmania, Tas. 7005, Australia.
  *Corresponding author and present address: Continental Evolution Research Group, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia ( nick.direen@adelaide.edu.au).
Copyright 2003 Geological Society of Australia
KEYWORDS
Gondwana • Rodinia • Ross–Delamerian Orogeny • Tasman Line • Tasmanides

ABSTRACT

The Tasman Line, a much-discussed concept in the geology and tectonics of eastern Australia, has a long and chequered history of interpretation. This extends to current debates regarding the age and position of the Tasman Line in Gondwana–Rodinia reconstructions. We present constraints, from mapping, geochemistry and geophysics, on the interpretation of gravity and magnetic lineaments attributed to the Tasman Line in New South Wales, South Australia, Victoria and Tasmania. These pieces of evidence suggest a protracted and complex latest Neoproterozoic to Carboniferous geological history that produces a variety of geophysical responses, rather than a simple 'Line'. We also find no evidence of Rodinian breakup age activity responsible for any of the anomalies. In light of these findings, our preference is that the Tasman Line concept be abandoned as misleading, especially with regard to models of Rodinia–Gondwana breakup, which must have occurred elsewhere, possibly well to the east. Instead, the rocks preserved in the westernmost part of the Tasmanides are consistent with previously proposed 'Southwest Pacific'-style models for Neoproterozoic continental breakup, margin formation and reaccretion of continental fragments in the Early Palaeozoic.


Received 18 June 2002; accepted 17 March 2003

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1046/j.1440-0952.2003.01005.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member