|
If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||||||
  Economic InquiryVolume 47 Issue 3, Pages 598 - 602 Published Online: 17 Apr 2008 © 2009 Western Economic Association International A Journal of the Western Economic Association International
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 78K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking  ON THE EFFICIENCY OF AC/DC: BON SCOTT VERSUS BRIAN JOHNSON *We thank Steven Levitt for his support and popularization of this research (see, for example, Levitt, 2007). We thank Nathan Berg, Gary Charness, Bill Harbaugh, and Kendra McLeish for valuable suggestions and comments. We also thank a delayed Air Canada flight and a bar in the Vancouver airport for providing the time, space, and resources necessary to pursue this research. All errors are attributable to Air Canada. Copyright © 2009 Western Economic Association International ABSTRACTWe use tools from experimental economics to address the age-old debate regarding who was a better singer in the band AC/DC. Our results suggest that (using wealth maximization as a measure of "better") listening to Brian Johnson (relative to listening to Bon Scott) resulted in "better" outcomes in an ultimatum game. These results may have important implications for settling drunken music debates and environmental design issues in organizations. (JEL C7, C9, D6, Z1) Online Early publication April 17, 2008 | 
|
| |||||||||||
 | Journal of Money, Credit and Banking |
Click here to access a FREE sample issue. | |
