If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Volume 36 Issue 6, Pages 717 - 732

Published Online: 8 Nov 2002

© 2006 The Authors; Journal compilation © 2006 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 164K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Understanding and evaluating qualitative research*
Ellie Fossey , Carol Harvey, Fiona McDermott, Larry Davidson
Ellie Fossey, Lecturer (Correspondence)
School of Occupational Therapy, La Trobe University, Melbourne, ­Victoria 3086, Australia. Email: e.fossey@latrobe.edu.au
Carol Harvey, Senior Lecturer
Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Fiona McDermott, Senior Lecturer
Mental Health Practice Research Unit, School of Social Work, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Larry Davidson, Associate Professor
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New ­Haven, Connecticut, USA
 *The second article in an occasional series on 'Conducting Research in Psychiatry', coordinated by the Australasian Society for Psychiatric Research and the Research Board of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists
Copyright 2002 Blackwell Science Asia Pty Ltd
KEYWORDS
qualitative evidence • qualitative method • research appraisal

ABSTRACT

Qualitative research aims to address questions concerned with developing an understanding of the meaning and experience dimensions of humans' lives and social worlds. Central to good qualitative research is whether the research participants' subjective meanings, actions and social contexts, as understood by them, are illuminated. This paper aims to provide beginning researchers, and those unfamiliar with qualitative research, with an orientation to the principles that inform the evaluation of the design, conduct, findings and interpretation of qualitative research. It orients the reader to two philosophical perspectives, the interpretive and critical research paradigms, which underpin both the qualitative research methodologies most often used in mental health research, and how qualitative research is evaluated. Criteria for evaluating quality are interconnected with standards for ethics in qualitative research. They include principles for good practice in the conduct of qualitative research, and for trustworthiness in the interpretation of qualitative data. The paper reviews these criteria, and discusses how they may be used to evaluate qualitative research presented in research reports. These principles also offer some guidance about the conduct of sound qualitative research for the beginner qualitative researcher.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member