If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 66K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Early pregnancy termination with mifepristone and misoprostol in Norway
Line Bjørge , Synnøve Lian Johnsen , Grete Midbøe , Grete Augestad , Ingrid Økland , Harald Helland , Sverre Stray-Pedersen and Ole Erik Iversen
  From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Address for correspondence: Professor Ole Erik Iversen, M.D., Ph.D.
Kvinneklinikken
N-5021 Haukeland Hospital, Bergen
Norway
e-mail: oeiv@haukeland.no
 

Deceased

Copyright Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001
KEYWORDS
antiprogestin • pregnacy termination • prostaglandin analog

ABSTRACT

Objectives. Medical abortion was first introduced in Norway in April 1998. The aims of this study were to assess the efficacy, side effects, and acceptability of medical abortion using mifepristone orally and misoprostol vaginally in a Norwegian population.

Design. The study included the first 226 pregnant women with gestational age of <63 days who requested nonsurgical abortion during the first year in the first Norwegian hospital using this regimen.

Methods. All women received a single dose of mifepristone 600 mg orally, followed at 48 hours by 800 μg misoprostol vaginally. Treatment outcome and complications were the principal outcome measures. We also measured the rates of side effects such as abdominal pain and bleeding and the women's acceptability of treatment.

Results. Abortion was successful in 95%, surgical evacuation became necessary in 4%, and the pregnancy continued in one woman. During the study period the method was chosen by 23% of those requesting abortion before 63 days amenorrhea; 80% would use the method again; 81% would recommend it to a friend; in retrospect, 69% would not have been willing to be randomly allocated to either a medical or a surgical method.

Conclusions. The combination of orally administrated mifepristone and vaginally administrated misoprostol is an abortion method that is both effective and safe, has few side effects and is well accepted by Norwegian women.


Submitted 9 February, 2001
Accepted 13 July, 2001

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1600-0412.2001.801118.pp.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member