ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML,  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Trust, control and the role of interorganizational systems in electronic partnerships
Michael J. Gallivan & Gordon Depledge
 Computer Information Systems Department, Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, PO Box 4015, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA, e-mail: mgallivan@gsu.edu
Copyright 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
KEYWORDS
trust • control • interorganizational systems • McDonaldization

ABSTRACT

Abstract. To survive and thrive in today's competitive marketplace, organizations are increasingly migrating to new organizational structures in which partnerships and interorganizational systems (IOSs) are becoming more important. The success of these partnerships depends on both trust and control – complex constructs that act on and shape each other over time. Many organizations assume that high levels of trust are necessary for net-enabled electronic partnerships. We examine this assumption from two perspectives: the initial decision to enter into a partnership or alliance, and its ongoing operation. Our findings suggest that researchers have treated trust simplistically, failing to distinguish the need for trust (which is inversely related to the organization's ability to control its partners) and the level of trust (which is an actual quantity that may change during the lifetime of the partnership). In many organizations, there is a gap between these two trust dimensions, which management attempts to close by changing the level of control. In this process, the IOS is key. To understand the relationship of IOS use to trust and control, we applied structured content analysis and analytic induction to 16 published case studies and used the results to create a framework for relating trust and control. At the heart of the framework is the recognition that trust and control are not simple substitutes for each other. Rather, they form a dialectic, where it makes sense to consider each construct only in relationship to the other. Using the framework, we identify areas for follow-up research and suggestions for practitioners.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1046/j.1365-2575.2003.00146.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Hot Papers
Security and Communication Networks

Security and Communication Networks
Check out this HOT article!

Mathematical model for constructing passwords from biometrical data

Hot Papers
Software: Practice and Experience

Software: Practice and Experience
Check out this HOT article!

Platform-independent profiling in a virtual execution environment

Hot Papers
Expert Systems

Expert Systems
Check out this HOT article!

Analysis of cancer data: a data mining approach