ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Addiction

Addiction

Volume 96 Issue 9, Pages 1289 - 1296

Published Online: 3 May 2002

Journal compilation © 2010 Society for the Study of Addiction



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 134K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Pilot randomized controlled study of dexamphetamine substitution for amphetamine dependence
James Shearer , Alex Wodak , Richard P. Mattick , Ingrid van Beek , John Lewis , Wayne Hall , Kate Dolan
  1 National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia   2 Alcohol & Drug Service, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia   3 National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia   4 Kirketon Road Centre (KRC), Sydney Hospital, New South Wales, Australia   5 Pacific Laboratory Medicine Services, Northern Sydney Health, New South Wales, Australia   6 National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia   7 National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Copyright Society for the Study of Addiction to Alcohol and Other Drugs

ABSTRACT


Aims. To test the feasibility of conducting a definitive randomized controlled trial of dexamphetamine substitution for amphetamine dependent people and provide preliminary data.
Design. An open, two-group pre-post randomized controlled trial.
Participants. Forty-one long-term, dependent amphetamine users seeking treatment.
Intervention. Twenty subjects were offered weekly counselling. Twenty-one subjects were, in addition, prescribed up to 60 mg dexamphetamine daily.
Measurements. Immunoassay and mass spectrometric urinalysis techniques were used to identify the presence of amphetamine and methylamphetamine in urine. The Opiate Treatment Index and Severity of Dependence Scale were used to collect pre- and post-self-report data. Subjects were screened using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview.
Findings. Reduced street amphetamine use and amphetamine dependence was observed both in subjects prescribed dexamphetamine and subjects receiving counselling only. Treatment subjects appeared more likely to attend counselling.
Conclusions. A definitive randomized controlled trial of dexamphetamine substitution using the techniques and instruments piloted in this study is feasible. Users appeared to be attracted and retained in substitution treatment. The intervention also appeared to be acceptable to clinicians.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96912898.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now