If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 85K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

An Evaluation of Onset and Duration of Action of Patanol® (Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.1%) Compared to Claritin® (Loratadine 10 mg) Tablets in Acute Allergic Conjunctivitis in the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model
Mark B.Abelson 1 , M.D. and Donna L.Welch 2 , R.N.
  1 Harvard Medical School and Schepens Eye Research Institute, Boston, MA ;   2 Ophthalmic Research Associates, North Andover, MA
Copyright © Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000

ABSTRACT

 

ABSTRACT.

Purpose: To compare the clinical efficacy of Patanol® (olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1%) to Claritin® (loratadine 10 mg) tablets, in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.

Methods: This was a randomized, double-masked, single center, contralateral controlled, antigen challenge model study. The concentration of allergen that elicited a positive response was determined at Visits 1 and 2 (itching ≥2 and redness ≥2 OU). At Visit 3, 29 subjects were randomized into two groups. Fifteen subjects received Claritin® tablet and Patanol® ophthalmic solution 0.1% in one eye and placebo in the contralateral eye. Fourteen subjects received placebo tablet and Patanol® in one eye and placebo in the contralateral eye. One hour after drug administration, subjects were challenged with the antigen that elicited a positive response. At 3, 7, and 10 minutes, itching was subjectively evaluated. At Visit 4, the same procedure was followed as in Visit 3, but antigen challenge occurred 8 hours after drug instillation.

Results: Results were analyzed by eye. Eyes treated with Patanol® (concomitant with placebo tablet) had significantly lower ocular itching scores when compared to eyes treated with placebo (concomitant with Claritin®) at 3, 7 and 10 minutes in the onset of action evaluation (p<0.05). Eyes treated with Patanol® (concomitant with placebo tablet) had significantly lower ocular itching scores at 7 minutes and there was a statistical trend (0.05<p<0.1) at 10 minutes in duration of action evaluation.

Conclusions: Patanol® therapy was significantly more efficacious than Claritin® in reducing ocular itching related to allergic conjunctivitis.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1034/j.1600-0420.2000.078s230060.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member