If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() Journal of Agricultural EconomicsVolume 58 Issue 1, Pages 24 - 36 Published Online: 22 Jan 2007 Journal compilation © 2010 The Agricultural Economics Society Published on behalf of the Agricultural Economics Society
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 497K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Bias from Farmer Self-Selection in Genetically Modified Crop Productivity Estimates: Evidence from Indian Data We gratefully acknowledge Yousouf Ismael's assistance in data collection. We would like to thank the editor and two anonymous referees for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper. Any remaining shortcomings are our own. Copyright 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd KEYWORDS
Biotechnology
•
development economics
•
genetic modification
•
productivity analysis
KEYWORDS
Q12
•
D81
ABSTRACTIn the continuing debate over the impact of genetically modified (GM) crops on farmers of developing countries, it is important to accurately measure magnitudes such as farm-level yield gains from GM crop adoption. Yet most farm-level studies in the literature do not control for farmer self-selection, a potentially important source of bias in such estimates. We use farm-level panel data from Indian cotton farmers to investigate the yield effect of GM insect-resistant cotton. We explicitly take into account the fact that the choice of crop variety is an endogenous variable which might lead to bias from self-selection. A production function is estimated using a fixed-effects model to control for selection bias. Our results show that efficient farmers adopt Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton at a higher rate than their less efficient peers. This suggests that cross-sectional estimates of the yield effect of Bt cotton, which do not control for self-selection effects, are likely to be biased upwards. However, after controlling for selection bias, we still find that there is a significant positive yield effect from adoption of Bt cotton that more than offsets the additional cost of Bt seed. (Original submitted January 2006, revision received April 2006, accepted July 2006.) |