If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() Oxford Bulletin of Economics and StatisticsVolume 67 Issue 5, Pages 571 - 595 Published Online: 27 Sep 2005 © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd and the Department of Economics, University of Oxford
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 196K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Regression Models with Data-based Indicator Variables* *Financial support from the ESRC under a Professorial Research Fellowship, RES051270035, and from the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Lisboa), is gratefully acknowledged by the two authors, respectively, as are helpful comments from two anonymous referees and the Editors correcting a number of infelicities. Copyright 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd KEYWORDS C51 • C22 ABSTRACTOrdinary least squares estimation of an impulse-indicator coefficient is inconsistent, but its variance can be consistently estimated. Although the ratio of the inconsistent estimator to its standard error has a t-distribution, that test is inconsistent: one solution is to form an index of indicators. We provide Monte Carlo evidence that including a plethora of indicators need not distort model selection, permitting the use of many dummies in a general-to-specific framework. Although White's (1980) heteroskedasticity test is incorrectly sized in that context, we suggest an easy alteration. Finally, a possible modification to impulse 'intercept corrections' is considered. Final Manuscript Received: March 2005 |