ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 488K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Possible evidence for a variable fine-structure constant from QSO absorption lines: systematic errors
M.T. Murphy 1 J.K. Webb 1 V.V. Flambaum 1 C.W. Churchill 2 J.X. Prochaska 3
  1School of Physics, The University of New South Wales, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia   2Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA   3The Observatories of the Carnegie Institute of Washington, 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 91101, USA
Correspondence to mim@phys.unsw.edu.au
 

1 We can see this as follows. We can ignore the term in q2 since these coefficients are typically an order of magnitude smaller than the q1 coefficients. Consider two transitions, one with a low atomic mass, the other a high atomic mass. Typically, the difference between the q1 coefficients for a light species (e.g. Mg ii) and a heavy species (e.g. Fe ii) is ∼1000 cm−1. Equation (1), applied to these two transitions, then shows that a precision of ω0 of ∼0.02 cm−1 is required in order to detect a variation of    .

 

2 iraf is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.

 

3 The 1953 formula is of the same form as the 1966 formula (equation 2) but has slightly different parameters: 6432.8, 2949 810, 146, 25 540 and 41 in order from left to right, numerator to denominator.

 

4 Each set of ThAr lines never included any of the ThAr lines from any other set.

Copyright The Royal Astronomical Society
KEYWORDS
atomic data • line: profiles • instrumentation: spectrographs • methods: data analysis • techniques: spectroscopic • quasars: absorption lines

ABSTRACT

Comparison of quasar (QSO) absorption spectra with laboratory spectra allows us to probe possible variations in the fundamental constants over cosmological time-scales. In a companion paper we present an analysis of Keck/HIRES spectra and report possible evidence suggesting that the fine-structure constant, α, may have been smaller in the past:     over the redshift range    . In this paper we describe a comprehensive investigation into possible systematic effects. Most of these do not significantly influence our results. When we correct for those which do produce a significant systematic effect in the data, the deviation of     from zero becomes more significant. We are led increasingly to the interpretation that α was slightly smaller in the past.


Accepted 2001 July 9. Received 2001 April 3; in original form 2000 December 20

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-2966.2001.04841.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member