ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine

Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine

Volume 16 Issue 2, Pages 62 - 66

Published Online: 3 Nov 2003

© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S


The official publication of the Photomedicine Society, the British Photodermatology Group and the European Society of Photodermatology
Published on Behalf of
Go to Society Site


< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 66K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Photoscratch testing in systemic drug-induced photosensitivity
V. Conilleau, A. Dompmartin, M. Michel, L. Verneuil, D. Leroy
Dermatology Service of Caen, France
Copyright © Munksgaard 2000
KEYWORDS
photosensitivity • adverse drug reaction • photopatch testing • scratch test

ABSTRACT

Because of numerous false-negative results, photopatch testing is seldom relevant in systemic drug-induced photosensitivity. These false-negative photopatch test results can be attributed to the inability of the drug to penetrate into the epidermis. In order to enhance the penetration of the tested drug into the epidermis, some authors proposed to breach the cutaneous barrier. We performed a prospective study comparing photopatch and photoscratch testing. Fifteen patients presenting with a systemic drug-induced photosensitivity, proved by a favourable outcome after discontinuing the drug, were tested. For each drug, photopatch and photoscratch tests were performed. Two-thirds of the patients had negative photopatch and photoscratch tests with the suspected drugs. Photopatch and photoscratch tests were positive and relevant, respectively, in 3 and 4 patients. Photoscratch tests induced more false-positive results due to irritation confirmed on control subjects. Our study proves that photoscratch tests do not change the sensitivity of phototesting.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1034/j.1600-0781.2000.d01-5.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Wiley Medical Twitter