If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||
![]() International Studies QuarterlyVolume 51 Issue 2, Pages 457 - 480 Published Online: 29 Jun 2007 © 2009 International Studies Association Published on behalf of the International Studies Association
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 175K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Foreign Discrimination, Protection for Exporters, and U.S. Trade Liberalization Author's note: I would like to thank Dirk De Bièvre, Gemma Mateo, Daniel Verdier, and the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier versions of this article. Audiences at the Dublin City University, the Mannheim Centre for European Social Research, and the University College Dublin also provided useful criticisms. Finally, I am grateful to the European University Institute for financial and logistical support in carrying out this research. Copyright © 2007 International Studies Association. ABSTRACTCurrent research suggests that changes in societal demands or in political institutions propelled the far-reaching reduction of American external trade barriers since the mid-1930s, yet is unable to account for the exact pattern or timing of trade liberalization. I argue instead that exporters lobby more against losses than in favor of gains of foreign market access. Whenever foreign countries inhibit access to their markets by establishing a discriminatory trading arrangement, negatively affected exporters mobilize in defense of their interests. This lobbying then prompts excluded countries' governments to engage in policies aimed at the protection of exporter interests. Applying this argument to U.S. trade policies from the 1930s to the 1960s, I demonstrate that American exporters repeatedly mobilized in response to discrimination in Europe. The resulting peaks in exporter mobilization explain the passage of the important trade bills known as the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act (1934) and Trade Expansion Act (1962). |
|
![]() | |||||||