ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

International Studies Quarterly

International Studies Quarterly

Volume 51 Issue 2, Pages 457 - 480

Published Online: 29 Jun 2007

© 2009 International Studies Association



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 175K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Foreign Discrimination, Protection for Exporters, and U.S. Trade Liberalization
ANDREAS DÜR 1
  1 University College Dublin

  Author's note: I would like to thank Dirk De Bièvre, Gemma Mateo, Daniel Verdier, and the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier versions of this article. Audiences at the Dublin City University, the Mannheim Centre for European Social Research, and the University College Dublin also provided useful criticisms. Finally, I am grateful to the European University Institute for financial and logistical support in carrying out this research.

Copyright © 2007 International Studies Association.

ABSTRACT

Current research suggests that changes in societal demands or in political institutions propelled the far-reaching reduction of American external trade barriers since the mid-1930s, yet is unable to account for the exact pattern or timing of trade liberalization. I argue instead that exporters lobby more against losses than in favor of gains of foreign market access. Whenever foreign countries inhibit access to their markets by establishing a discriminatory trading arrangement, negatively affected exporters mobilize in defense of their interests. This lobbying then prompts excluded countries' governments to engage in policies aimed at the protection of exporter interests. Applying this argument to U.S. trade policies from the 1930s to the 1960s, I demonstrate that American exporters repeatedly mobilized in response to discrimination in Europe. The resulting peaks in exporter mobilization explain the passage of the important trade bills known as the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act (1934) and Trade Expansion Act (1962).


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00459.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
ISQU

Register now to receive FREE Table of Contents
E-Alerts

Find out about new International Studies Quarterly articles as they publish!

Politics