ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 169K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Quality of life measures in psoriasis: a critical appraisal of their quality
D. M. Ashcroft, A. Li Wan Po, H. C. Williams & C. E. M. Griffiths
  1 Centre for Evidence-Based Pharmacotherapy, Aston University, Birmingham   2 Department of Dermatology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham   3 Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.
Correspondence to: Professor AlainLi Wan Po
Copyright 1998 Blackwell Science Ltd.

ABSTRACT

In recent years, the importance of patient-generated evaluations in assessing the impact of healthcare has been recognized. A plethora of quality of life (QoL) instruments have been developed to measure the burden of psoriasis and its treatment on the patient. We review the QoL measures and provide a critical appraisal of their quality. There is considerable variation in how the instruments have been constructed, the categories and items included, and the methods by which their reliability and validity have been examined. In order to guide investigators in their choice of instrument, further head-to-head comparisons of measures should be undertaken. When QoL measures are compared, a Pearson or rank-order correlation coefficient is not sufficient to indicate agreement. Methods that examine agreement, rather than association, are available and should be used. In the future, we will need to demonstrate whether these measurement tools are ready for widespread implementation in clinical trials or routine patient follow-up.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1046/j.1365-2710.1998.00181.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now