If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() Value in HealthVolume 4 Issue 2, Pages 112 - 112 Published Online: 9 Oct 2008 © 2010 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Published on behalf of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
Abstract | Full Text: PDF (Size: 1000K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking PDB5 A COST-MINIMIZATION STUDY TO DETERMINE THE IMPACT OF ADDING GLUCOVANCE TO A COUNTY HOSPITAL FORMULARY Copyright Blackwell Science Inc ABSTRACTOBJECTIVE: This study is conducted to determine the economic impact of the addition of a new diabetic agent, Glucovance (metformin/glyburide) to a county hospital system with over 21,000 diabetic patients. METHODS: A cost minimization analysis between Glucovance and metformin plus any of the sulfonylureas is conducted. Initially, a database of all diabetic patients in the county hospital system is created to determine total number of patients who are being treated with metformin alone and in combination with other sulfonylureas, glipizide XL, generic glipizide, glyburide, and glimepiride. Next, the cost difference between treating with Glucovance alone or as a dual therapy with both metformin 500mg plus the most common dose of each sulfonylurea is calculated to determine the incremental cost savings over a year's time of therapy. Only the direct costs of the drugs involved are utilized in this study. RESULTS: The results indicate that if all of the 6,622 patients who are on dual therapy with both metformin 500mg and a usual maintenance dose of a sulfonylurea drug are switched to the new combination product, the county system can save over half a million dollars ($555,566.00) in a year, in direct drug costs alone. CONCLUSION: These results illustrate that there is an economic incentive to add the new combination product to the formulary. However, future cost-effectiveness studies are needed to determine the impact of this decision both in terms of clinical and economic outcomes. |