If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
The plaque inhibitory effect of a CPC mouthrinse in a 3-day plaque accumulation model – a cross-over study
PA Versteeg, NAM Rosema, NL Hoenderdos, DE Slot, GA Van der Weijden
Authors' affiliations:
PA Versteeg, NAM Rosema, NL Hoenderdos, DE Slot, GA van der Weijden, Department of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Correspondence to PA Versteeg
Department of Periodontology
Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA)
University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam
Louwesweg 1
1066 EA Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel.: 0031 20 5188 548
Fax: 0031 20 5188 512
E-mail: p.versteeg@acta.nl
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S
KEYWORDS
cetylpyridinium chloride • clinical trial • dental plaque • hexetidine • mouthrinse
To cite this article:
Int J Dent Hygiene
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2009.00421.x
Versteeg PA, Rosema NAM, Hoenderdos NL, Slot DE, van der Weijden GA. The plaque inhibitory effect of a CPC mouthrinse in a 3-day plaque accumulation model – A cross-over study.

ABSTRACT

 Abstract: 

Objective: To test the plaque inhibitory effect of an experimental 0.07% cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) mouthrinse in a 3-day plaque accumulation model in a cross-over design.

Material and Methods: A total of 30 subjects (non-dental students), ≥18 years of age, were randomly assigned to use one of three different mouthrinses three times a day. After 3 days, the subjects returned for the clinical assessments and received a questionnaire to evaluate their attitude towards the product used by them. The cross-over procedure was repeated twice to have all subjects use all products.

Results: A total of 29 subjects completed the protocol and this resulted in a statistically significant difference between the three groups (< 0.001) with regard to plaque scores. Over three sessions, the mean plaque scores were 2.17 for the control product, 1.14 for the CPC group and 1.12 for the 0.1% Hexetidine product (positive control). Results of the questionnaire show that, compared with hexetidine, the taste of the CPC was appreciated better, and less oral sensations were observed following rinsing.

Conclusion: The CPC mouthrinse proved to be effective in inhibiting 'de novo' plaque formation to an extent similar to that of a 0.1% hexetidine product. Compared with hexetidine, the taste of the CPC was appreciated better and less oral sensations were observed following rinsing.


Dates: Accepted 10 September 2009

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1601-5037.2009.00421.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Announcing
 Early Childhood Oral Health

Early Childhood Oral Health

Available May 2009. Click on cover for more details.

Announcing
Physical Evaluation in Dental Practice

Physical Evaluation in Dental Practice

Click on cover for more details.