If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Ethology

Ethology

Early View (Articles online in advance of print)

Published Online: 2 Nov 2009

Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Verlag GmbH



< Previous Abstract

CURRENT ISSUES – PERSPECTIVES AND REVIEWS
Mate Choice for Genetic Benefits: Time to Put the Pieces Together
Attila Hettyey*†, Gergely Hegyi, Mikael Puurtinen, Herbert Hoi*, János Török & Dustin J. Penn*
  * Konrad Lorenz Institute for Ethology, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria
   Behavioural Ecology Group, Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
   Center of Excellence in Evolutionary Research, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
Correspondence to Attila Hettyey, Konrad Lorenz Institute for Ethology, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Savoyenstrasse 1/a, Vienna, A-1160, Austria.
E-mail: a.hettyey@klivv.oeaw.ac.at
Copyright Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Verlag GmbH

ABSTRACT

It is thought that mate choice allows individuals to obtain genetic benefits for their offspring, and although many studies have found some support for this hypothesis, several critical questions remain unresolved. One main problem is that empirical studies on mate choice and genetic benefits have been rather piecemeal. Some studies (1) aimed to test how mate choice affects offspring fitness, but have not examined whether the benefits are because of genetic effects. Other studies tested whether mate choice provides (2) additive or (3) non-additive genetic benefits and only a few studies (4) considered these genetic effects together. Finally, some studies (5) examined whether the potential benefits that might be gained from mate choice are due to additive genetic effects vs. non-additive effects, and although they found evidence for both, they did not examine whether mate choice is relevant. Furthermore, previous studies have usually not controlled for non-genetic sources of variation in offspring fitness. Thus, there remain gaping holes in our understanding, and it is the connections among the research approaches that now need more attention. We suggest that studies are needed that measure non-genetic effects, the potential benefits from both additive and non-additive genetic effects, and also determine whether mate choice exploits these potential benefits. Such integrative studies are necessary to put the pieces together and clarify the role of genetic benefits in the evolution of mate choice.


Received: February 25, 2009 Initial acceptance: May 5, 2009 Final acceptance: September 14, 2009 (J. Kotiaho)

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01704.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Latest News & Information

from the Wiley-Blackwell Life Sciences Team

Join Twitter for our News Updates
Darwin