ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Histopathology

Histopathology

Volume 55 Issue 5, Pages 525 - 534

Published Online: 4 Nov 2009

Journal compilation © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 1399K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma: a study of six cases and a meta-analytic study. Development of criteria for screening the entity with prognostic significance
Hamidreza Faraji, Bich N Nguyen 1 & Kien T Mai 1
 Division of Anatomical Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine , and   1 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Correspondence to Dr K T Mai, Anatomical Pathology, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8L6. e-mail: ktmai@ottawahospital.on.ca
Copyright Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
KEYWORDS
angiomyolipoma • carcinoma • epithelioid • kidney • PEComa
Faraji H, Nguyen B N & Mai K T
(2009) Histopathology55, 525–534
Renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma: a study of six cases and a meta-analytic study. Development of criteria for screening the entity with prognostic significance

ABSTRACT

Aims: Renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma (EAML) is only described in case reports or in multi-institutional small series. The aim was to report cases seen at our institution and to perform a meta-analysis based on a literature review.

Methods and results: Six EAML cases seen at our institution were reviewed and a meta-analysis performed using cases retrieved from a literature review. There were a total of 69 cases for review. The male:female ratio was 1:3. In the absence of areas of typical AML, useful features in distinguishing EAML from epithelial renal neoplasms include: extreme degree of cytological atypia, histiocytoid appearance, presence of melanocytic pigments, solid architecture with the absence of frequent areas of alveolar pattern, tubulo-papillary formation and scarring. A fatal outcome, distant or lymph node metastasis, venous invasion and local recurrence were considered as adverse events and occurred in 40% of cases over a period of follow-up of 3–60 months (mean 22.5 ± 18 months). Tumours with an unfavourable outcome showing marked cytological atypia and extensive tumour necrosis were larger (135 ± 43 mm) than those with a favourable outcome (79 ± 50 mm) (P < 0.002), and predominantly occurred in men.

Conclusions: Renal neoplasms with certain unusual features should be investigated immunohistochemically to rule out the possibility of EAML. The frequency of adverse outcome is lower in EAML than in renal cell carcinoma.


Date of submission 18 November 2008 Accepted for publication 19 March 2009

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03420.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Sign up for Content Alerts