If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() British Journal of DermatologyEarly View (Articles online in advance of print)Published Online: 18 Nov 2009 Journal compilation © 2010 British Association of Dermatologists An Official Journal of the British Association of Dermatologists
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 255K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking EPIDEMIOLOGY AND HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH Public at risk: a survey of sunbed parlour operating practices in Northern Ireland Copyright Journal Compilation © 2010 British Association of Dermatologists KEYWORDS melanoma • skin cancer • sunbeds ABSTRACTBackground The International Agency for Research on Cancer has identified artificial ultraviolet (UV) radiation as a class 1 carcinogen. The contribution of sunbeds to malignant melanoma has been estimated at 100 deaths per year in the U.K. The sunbed industry is growing and claims self-regulation. Objectives To explore the standards of operation and client protection for sunbed users. Methods An observational study of tanning parlour practices was conducted by Environmental Health Practitioners who made unannounced visits to the majority of known commercial tanning parlours in Northern Ireland (population 1·77 million) during July/August 2007. Descriptive statistics were produced and comparisons between groups were made using χ Results All 332 premises visited cooperated with the survey. The UV type in machines was unknown in 71·2% of premises while 15·6% reported using type 4, high-dose UV devices; 36·2% of premises did not regularly service sunbeds or were unsure. Unsupervised use of sunbeds was reported in 8·6% of parlours and 3·4% provided a home sunbed service. Eye protection was available in 97·6% of premises but 34·6% charged for the service and only 79·6% sanitized these between use. Of the responders 15·9% were members of the Sunbed Association. These were more likely to have maintenance records and operating manuals but were also more likely to provide a home sunbed service. Conclusions This study highlights the need for improved standards of regulation of the sunbed industry to protect clients from excessive and dangerous levels of UV radiation in a population where the numbers of melanomas continue to rise. Accepted for publication 1 November 2009 |